The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  Thom's nationally syndicated radio show    I'm confused about feminism

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Posted
I'm a guy, but have always supported what I thought were the principals of feminism: strength, independence, equal pay, equal respect, that a woman doesn't need a man "to complete her," etc. One of the stereotypical traits that is attributed in an often demeaning way is that women are too emotional and let their emotions crowd out logic and rational thinking too often, while men are the more rational, more logical, therefore more able to lead and make decisions.

I've heard that Huckabee, but have not heard it myself, thinks women should be subservient to men even though that flys in the face of "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Nevertheless, this isn't about Huckabee nor is it about the honesty of Hillary's emotional moment. It's about the post NH primary analysis by the pundits who claimed that the women voters turned sharply from Obama to Hillary because they were tired of seeing her being beaten up and they felt emotion for her emotional moment.

If these pundits are right I'd say the feminist movement just took a giant step backward as the NH women just voted for a presidential candidate based primarily on emotion and not on rational decision making. Hillary voted for the Iraq war, for the patriot axe (sic) she campaigned against flag burning even while Bush and Cheney burned the Constitution. Rupert Murdoch held a fundraiser for her, she's taking more money from big pharma and big corporations then any candidate, Burson Marstellar is her Think Tank/Marketing corporate image fixxer upper and it goes on and on. Bill Clinton gave us NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO, deregulated FCC and it goes on and on.

The biggest problem with this is that this race for the presidency is not about the president, but about We the people getting the government we deserve. Instead, if the pundits are right, the women voters of NH saw this as something of a game or tv reality show where people get voted off and they felt her pain and wanted her to be the last woman standing.

The one check on which candidates we don't want or need is the candidates the corporate media industrial complex is pushing the hardest for. Hillary gets the lion's share of coverage and will do, I suspect, less for We the People than the other Dem candidates and more for the corporations that are running this country into the ground.

Then we'll all be crying.
 
Posts: 360 | Location: Duvall, WA. | Registered: 10 January 2006Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  Thom's nationally syndicated radio show    I'm confused about feminism

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.