The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  Thom's nationally syndicated radio show    9/11 - Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Wood/Hutchison)

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Posted
Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect

by

Judy Wood and John Hutchison


http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/


Excerpt:

=======================
In considering how the WTC complex was destroyed, many people have criticised the research posted here because it does not state or describe the exact technology employed.

These pages include data which strongly implicates a class of technology as being one of the main ones used.

The data below seem to strongly tie up with features of what has become known as "The Hutchison Effect". The Hutchison Effect actually seems to describe a range of observed characteristics, some of which are listed below. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been experimenting with "field effects" for almost 30 years. There is a great deal of information about him on the internet, and a selection is linked from this set of pages.

The table below lists effects and events seen at or in the vicinity of World Trade Center and compares those with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. Clearly, the posting of this material is quite controversial, but even in the various documentaries that have featured John Hutchison, he has suggested that the techniques he has discovered and developed have been further refined by places like Lockheed Skunkworks, S.A.I.C. (Science Applications International Corp.), and also by perhaps other defense companies.
=======================


My comments: Although still under construction, the new paper gives many clues to the technology that was used to destroy the World Trade Center. Take a look at the many pictures and see for yourself! People can no longer claim that this technology does not exist. It definitely DOES exist!

Also note the two companies mentioned in the excerpt above (Lockheed Martin and SAIC). Both are sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society! The government even contracted with SAIC for the NIST Report.



See the "News" section of Dr Wood's website for upcoming interviews with Andrew Johnson where he will discuss the new paper. Also in the "news" section is a downloadable MP3 of an interview with John Hutchison.
http://drjudywood.com/#news


For proof that the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were all orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media, see my new article:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=151&Itemid=60


Also note the two Court Cases in the US District Court, Southern New York, with attorney Jerry Leaphart:

Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case


Bottom line... there were NO hijackings on 9/11 and the entire War On Terror is BOGUS!

Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCDu2V3yjS4

As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=no_planer_resigns


What about the eyewitnesses who say they saw planes hit the towers, you ask? See the following analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews, which were published in the New York Times. You'll learn that only a very small percentage of the First Responders reported seeing airplanes hit the towers. Even fewer reported hearing them. But... they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on! Whatever they saw "hit" the towers was a projection:

Going in Search of Planes in NYC
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=...iew&id=134&Itemid=60


What about the airplane wreckage, you ask? Well, first of all, there are NO verified airplane parts. (The government refuses to release any.) And second, when an airplane crashes into a building, the engines are not going to wind up underneath scaffolding:
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/trouble/73_230806wtc7.jpg

See here for more:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=trouble_with_jones#NBB


What about the cell phone calls, you ask? Faked using advanced voice synthesizer technology as reported in the Washington Post two and a half years before 9/11:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm



There were NO hijackings on 9/11.

There were NO plane crashes on 9/11.

The entire War On Terror is BOGUS.
 
Posts: 17 | Location: New York City | Registered: 12 November 2007Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
The moon shot was fake and pro wrestling is real.


A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
 
Posts: 8264 | Location: Fl | Registered: 05 July 2001Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sawdust:
The moon shot was fake and pro wrestling is real.


And you believe in a conspiracy as put forth by the NeoCon Bush/Cheney cabal who have lied us into Iraq knowing war would kill thousands. Yet you doubt a slew of physics professors and a renowned and respected theologeon.

Duh!
 
Posts: 360 | Location: Duvall, WA. | Registered: 10 January 2006Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
It never ceases to amaze me that you don't know how crazy you sound.


A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
 
Posts: 8264 | Location: Fl | Registered: 05 July 2001Report This Post
Picture of Slabmaster
Posted Hide Post
I knew it was all a stunt for TV ratings. I saw "Wag the dog".
I don't think there is even a war going on.
I believe the occupants of those planes and the people in the buildings along with all the troops supposedly in Iraq and Afghanistan are actually being held hostage by GW Bush in a secret room under the Oval office.
I have scientific proof that they feed those people experimental food made from the alien corpses recovered from Area 51!
GW Bush and Haliburton are creating a zombi race of mutants that will take over all of the jobs at Walmart!!!!

We're screwwwwwed!!!!!!!!!


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user."

Theodore Roosevelt, 1913

 
Posts: 2404 | Location: Redmond WA | Registered: 04 September 2006Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
I have yet to see the colleagues of any twoofer professor rally en masse around their woo-woo.

There is no evidence for the existence of a directed energy weapon that does not create noticeable heat and light on the target.

And what does a divinity degree do to strengthen the validity of a whackjob's opinion of a physical phenommenon? We have theologians telling us that all existing life forms originated as they are today in one day. Does that mean that Creationism is science and Darwinism is a lie?

I have already replicated the results of some of the so-called Hutchison Effect in my kitchen using no electronics. He's nuts. He's been debunked. His head bolts aren't torqued right.

http://www.trailerparkscience.com/#Experiments.

THe crap about no hijacking, no plane parts and no dead bodies is a horrendous lie.


Gun toting, poetry writing liberal retired Army NCO. Live with it.
 
Posts: 359 | Location: Spanaway, WA | Registered: 19 June 2006Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  Thom's nationally syndicated radio show    9/11 - Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Wood/Hutchison)

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.