The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  Environment    New Orleans destruction PREDICTED by National Geographic a year ago and FEMA knew!!

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Picture of blueinmo
Posted
http://www3.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0410/feature5/in...tionalgeographic.com

FEMA KNEW!!! LIARS!!!
I thought I was reading a current story of the destuction of New Orleans. but NO!. This story is a year old. The PREDICION is uncanny.
You must read the whole thing.


Defending the country against it's government is a requirment for every patriotic citizen.
 
Posts: 252 | Location: joplin,mo | Registered: 20 April 2005Report This Post
Picture of Gnarlodious
Posted Hide Post
Absolutely unbelievable! Errr... believable I mean. Thank you blueinmo for that link.

EVERYONE MUST READ THE PROPHESY!

It's uncanny to the very details what FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers predicted. Especially unnerving is the statement that the entire region is sinking due to the extraction of oil and gas under the city. Guess we'll have to bill this one to the MegaPetroCorporation.

I'm making an archive of the page before it disappears.


-- The only time we see the middle of the road is as we run from side to side. R.O.Clark
 
Posts: 3959 | Location: Santa Fe | Registered: 11 June 2003Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
Don't worry, Gnarly, this is well documented at many levels and won't disappear.

My hope, trivial though it may be, is that this long and well documented litany -- and now maybe liturgy -- of environmental degredation, not just here but over the entire increasingly global economy-ized planet, will begin to get it's due attention. But sadly, the real underlying truth of this tragedy may never be faced, despite what will undoubtedly be a continuing string of environmentally based tragedies as our environmental abuse chips get called in.

From the above link:

quote:
"When you look at the broadest perspective, short-term advantages can be gained by exploiting the environment. But in the long term you're going to pay for it. Just like you can spend three days drinking in New Orleans and it'll be fun. But sooner or later you're going to pay."
 
Posts: 2356 | Location: Road Prison 36 | Registered: 20 August 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
Personally, I believe a lot of environmental destruction is going to dramaticly slow down. However, it is going to be a painful, unplanned, and chaotic rollback.

Due to greed and stupidity, our leaders left out a key point concerning the world oil supply. Whichever projection you believe on oil supply, 40 years, 20 years, or 10 years, your economy collapses long before the last drop is pumped.

The last barrels of oil become increasingly expensive to extract. The geopolitical landscape around those barrels becomes more unstable. Throw into the mix increasing natural disasters due to global warming, and the greed of oil companies.

Three dollar per gallon of gas is not the price peak.

We have built an economy, and a whole social structure (suburbs) on cheap oil.

It is all going to come tumbling down, and then the environment will get some relief. But how horrible because of no leadership, and popular denial, that it will involve a lot of suffering.
 
Posts: 855 | Location: Midwest | Registered: 08 November 2004Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
Yes, the Peak Oil issue is a key point.

We have developed in the past hundred or so years the most unstable of eco systems -- a mono culture based on non renewable fossil fuels. All eco systems depend on energy transformation and the more complexity, the more stability. We have an eco(nomy)system based on one source of energy, and like the lemmings -- who consume all of theirs in their very early level of succession tundra eco system when their population and "industrial" activities expand too fast -- we will be forced to decline, just as they always have. The difficulty is getting people to see parallels in nature to these fundamental particulars.

We can do it intelligently, seeing what is about to happen, or it can occur just as it always has for them in such circumstances -- in regular, observable cycles that include massive die offs. Time is a relative factor.
 
Posts: 2356 | Location: Road Prison 36 | Registered: 20 August 2005Report This Post
Picture of douglaslee
Posted Hide Post
Re:
quote:
Three dollar per gallon of gas is not the price peak.

We have built an economy, and a whole social structure (suburbs) on cheap oil.
Viable economies and social structures can even flourish with six dollar per gallon plus price(ours is 11 kr per liter). Community, civic planning, zoning restrictions requiring minimum infrastructure standards from developers, projected future prices of petrol being offered to public, might motivate county commissioners. Nah.


Blaise Pascal
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Pensees

 
Posts: 2917 | Location: Sverige | Registered: 21 June 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
Sadly, only relentless greed appears to be the corporoplutocrat's primary motivator... 'big' picture, near 'longer' term... Roll Eyes

Speak about destruction...!
 
Posts: 5740 | Location: Exile | Registered: 24 March 2003Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
If only the corrupt democrats in Louisiana would have spent the money earmarked for levee improvements on the levees instead of wasting it on their own pet projects. The people of NOLA are furious at their state and city officials and now finally they will receive their just punishment for their actions.

Lets only hope that the Bush administration runs the rebuilding of NOLA and doesnt start handing out checks to these criminals at the state level.
 
Posts: 1102 | Location: america | Registered: 06 September 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
There is no way, getting rid of the toxics in New Orleans anytime soon, from what I read. As for the energy crisis, theres many points of view there, there is already blackouts going on in LA, what do they think is going to happen? Climate Change is going on, indefinitly, folks. Now here comes hurricane Rita, slamming in. Is this the end of the beggining. The movies they made, didn't impress them I guess, until lives are lost. FEMA, better get a grip, and realize, the insurance companies are getting really nervous now.


LINDA
 
Posts: 144 | Location: BALTIMORE, MD. | Registered: 03 March 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
http://205.188.130.53/ngm/0410/feature5/?fs=www3.nationalgeographic.com

National Geographic Predicted New Orleans Disaster in 2001
 
Posts: 84 | Location: Earth | Registered: 06 September 2005Report This Post
Picture of blueinmo
Posted Hide Post
White House


White House Got Early Warning on Katrina

By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 24, 2006



In the 48 hours before Hurricane Katrina hit, the White House received detailed warnings about the storm's likely impact, including eerily prescient predictions of breached levees, massive flooding, and major losses of life and property, documents show.

A 41-page assessment by the Department of Homeland Security's National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center (NISAC), was delivered by e-mail to the White House's "situation room," the nerve center where crises are handled, at 1:47 a.m. on Aug. 29, the day the storm hit, according to an e-mail cover sheet accompanying the document.

The NISAC paper warned that a storm of Katrina's size would "likely lead to severe flooding and/or levee breaching" and specifically noted the potential for levee failures along Lake Pontchartrain. It predicted economic losses in the tens of billions of dollars, including damage to public utilities and industry that would take years to fully repair. Initial response and rescue operations would be hampered by disruption of telecommunications networks and the loss of power to fire, police and emergency workers, it said.

In a second document, also obtained by The Washington Post, a computer slide presentation by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, prepared for a 9 a.m. meeting on Aug. 27, two days before Katrina made landfall, compared Katrina's likely impact to that of "Hurricane Pam," a fictional Category 3 storm used in a series of FEMA disaster-preparedness exercises simulating the effects of a major hurricane striking New Orleans. But Katrina, the report warned, could be worse.

The hurricane's Category 4 storm surge "could greatly overtop levees and protective systems" and destroy nearly 90 percent of city structures, the FEMA report said. It further predicted "incredible search and rescue needs (60,000-plus)" and the displacement of more than a million residents.

The NISAC analysis accurately predicted the collapse of floodwalls along New Orleans's Lake Pontchartrain shoreline, an event that the report described as "the greatest concern." The breach of two canal floodwalls near the lake was the key failure that left much of central New Orleans underwater and accounted for the bulk of Louisiana's 1,100 Katrina-related deaths.

The documents shed new light on the extent on the administration's foreknowledge about Katrina's potential for unleashing epic destruction on New Orleans and other Gulf Coast cities and towns. President Bush, in a televised interview three days after Katrina hit, suggested that the scale of the flooding in New Orleans was unexpected. "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees. They did anticipate a serious storm," Bush said in a Sept. 1 interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

The reports echo warnings given around the same time by Max Mayfield, head of the National Hurricane Center, who began sounding the alarm when forecasters first placed Katrina on a collision with the Gulf Coast on the evening of Aug. 26. But the FEMA and NISAC reports provided much more detail and covered a wider range of possible consequences, from damaged ports and oil terminals to spikes in energy prices.

The White House declined to comment yesterday on the specifics of the reports but noted that the president has repeatedly acknowledged his displeasure with preparations for Katrina. "No one was pleased with the response by the government -- federal, state or local," spokesman Trent Duffy said. "We have already taken steps to be better prepared for future hurricanes, as you saw in the response to the hurricanes that followed Katrina."

The disclosure of the reports comes as the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee prepares to convene new hearings today into the federal government's performance during Katrina. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.), the committee's ranking Democrat, responded to the documents in a statement saying the administration's failure to fully heed the warnings of its analysts "compounded the tragedy."

"Two to three days before Katrina hit the Gulf Coast, it became clear that it would be the 'Big One' everyone has been talking about for years," Lieberman said.


Defending the country against it's government is a requirment for every patriotic citizen.
 
Posts: 252 | Location: joplin,mo | Registered: 20 April 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
...echoing (ignored?) information regarding terror suspects... prior to 9-11... Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 5740 | Location: Exile | Registered: 24 March 2003Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  Environment    New Orleans destruction PREDICTED by National Geographic a year ago and FEMA knew!!

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.