The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  World Affairs & Iraq    Pakistan: A Dry Run for Bushco?

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Posted
Does any thinking person really believe that the dictator of Pakistan is able to make ANY political or military decision without the approval, if not the actual direction of the US Government?

The answer is so damned obvious as to be childish. No, he can’t, because money talks very loudly. The 700 MILLION dollars in economic and military assistance the US gave to General Pervez Musharraf this year alone is most definitely not an altruistic gift that comes without strings.

The 800 million dollars scheduled to reach the Pakistani government in 2008 will continue the guarantee that Pakistan will continue to do exactly what the Bush administration. Musharraf would not last a day I office without US aid and protection. Not a single day....

...Could the events in Pakistan be a testing ground for what Bushco might be planning in the US to avoid the consequences of fair and democratic elections here in 2008?

Understand that none of Musharraf’s actions could have been implemented without the approval of the Bush administration. Understand as well that Condy Rice has announced that these actions will not mean the discontinuation of aid to the government of Pakistan.

Full article: http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=668


Informed Americans are Patriotic Americans.
 
Posts: 45 | Location: NYC | Registered: 19 July 2003Report This Post
Picture of BrentBoz-Hell
Posted Hide Post
It has been revealed that none other than John "Deathsquads" Negroponte has been n Pakistan, since Sept. 12th, "for a long-term strategic dialogue."

So, if we can't really concretely pin anything else on Bushco. at this point (not yet), can we at least say that Negroponte would have had an idea this was coming and would've kept Bushco. apprised?

http://archive.gulfnews.com/indepth/bhutto/more_stories/10153166.html

If the U.S. really wants political democracy in Pakistan it should've supported the return of Nawaz Sharif (a moderate Muslim who believes in the political democracy process). The Pakistan Supreme Court had ruled that Sharif could return, but he was arrested by the government at the airport.
 
Posts: 2365 | Location: beautiful downtown Portland | Registered: 01 July 2005Report This Post
Picture of douglaslee
Posted Hide Post
Now that Bhutto is dead
quote:
Bhutto's aides said they doubted militant commander Baitullah Mehsud was behind the attack on the opposition leader and said the government's claim that she died when she hit her head on the sunroof of her vehicle was "dangerous nonsense."

Cheema said the government's account was based on "nothing but the facts"
from TPM Kind'a Rovian no?


Blaise Pascal
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Pensees

 
Posts: 2917 | Location: Sverige | Registered: 21 June 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
This is nothing new, its been going on for Hundreds of Years.

read; WAR IS A RACKET, by Smudley Butler.

The shortest book I ever read. Smudley Butler was a Major general in the USMC. In a book with only 27 pages, Butler details his 33 years in the USMC. He retired in 1935, and only then did he start to relize what he had done.

Starting in 1898 the USMC regularly Invaded countries in central and south america. American Indian uprisings, China-Boxer rebellion, philipines, most Carribean Islands...supressing rebellions by the peasants and putting in Dictators. Behind the marines came legions of USA bussiness ready to set up plantations, dig Oil wells and stake out mining claims. When the peasants started to organize, Butlers Marines would return to protect US interests, enforce slave labor conditions, and put down Union protests, Labor strikes and rebellion.

Butlers famous statement; "Al Capone is a boy scout compared to US"

I used to think the Hippy`s made up all this CRAP, but ovioulsy it true.

Add Pakistan to the List, who`s not on the LIST of USA BushCO controll..


All the worlds weapons are a symbol of human failure
 
Posts: 92 | Location: Pittsburgh Pa | Registered: 08 February 2007Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  World Affairs & Iraq    Pakistan: A Dry Run for Bushco?

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.