Set aside the bungled range of cover stories that had her dying of
1. a bullet to the neck 2. a bullet to the spine 3. shrapnel damage
Now I awake to hear the Pakistan Surgeon General state, "Oh no she didnt die of any external substance she died BREAKING HER NECK DIVING INTO HER VEHICLE" (so its her fault, right?, RIGHT?)
So did she have a bullet hole or not, or did we lose her neck, like we lost JFK's brain?
*****************Winners / Losers regarding this assasination************
Pakistani people, LOSERS Musharaf- LOSER (think about it- If he killed his opposition, he looks like the dictator he wanted so desperately to avoid the appearance of, that he stepped down from all the power to give the appearance he only has some- Since she died, he is obviously on the hook for DENYING her (and OUR senators Biden et al) who requested it ) minor security implements like tinted windows, IED jamming technology, and the complete lack of physical security during her assasination, despite an attempt on her life within the last 2 months.
I know you're saying, -but He wins because he stays in power if he cancels the elections, and he wins if he has the elections since he killed his opponent,
I would argue the appearance of fairness, and a need to not be depicted as an iron fist tyrant outweighs his need to secure power, Power he already took a P.R. hit grabbing by locking up the Supreme Court and bludgeoning lawyers on CNN for the whole world to see. He looks far worse than he did a week ago, before an election he was sure to lose.
DEMOCRACY- LOSER, 63% of the people were going to vote for her via the last major poll taken now they may not get to vote at all,
Al Qaida LOSER- why would they kill the home grown democratic leader , maintain the regime grip of the US puppet , and enhance the power and the moral position of the US who has given Musharraf 10 BILLION dollars to fight terrorism. Osama said in his first tape, he was going to war with us to get our footprint out of their sand. Bush's buddy buddy connection wiht Musharraf is the biggest footprint over there outside Iraq, and the ONLY way to get to Afghanistan. A democratic election and the dissolution of military power, and the repulsion of US influence would be the biggest Xmas gift Al Qaida would wish for. Im suprised THEY werent guarding her.
AMERICAN DEMOCRATS/INDEPENDENTS LOSERSwith the confluence of 2 factors, George gave them nuclear weapons, ( we got mangos in the trade- woo hoo) George didnt say a peep and let govt violence and repression go unfrowned upon These two stances make it all but impossible for any democrat to classify the middle east as a law enforcement problem, because of the clear chaos WE FOSTERED, and the kindling of nuclear weapons, and the clear presence of shady factions, who no one can argue likes us. This also cuts the B@LL$ off of Ron Paul who doesnt believe in intervention.
*************Now thru the looking glass*****
[u]If you are a Republican with 20% approval rating[/u], and [u]your buddy is seen on international news nightly doing the kind of bullying [/u] we killed Saddam Hussein over (after supporting him to do it) and [u]if the Iraq war is all your fault [/u] and the Iran concoction was exposed, your voracity challenged and people began to doubt the potency of AlQaida and the need to spend $15 billion a week Sen(R)AL -Ted Stevens blabbed on the floor of the senate, as to how much it really costs, and as the committee Chair he should know)
[u] since Osama cant be found[/u](despite claiming for two terms thats your chief priority, and rational for ridiculous, ill accounted, budget expenditures and Al Qaida had lain dormant for 6 years ( if it was ever them at all) and you are about to lose all the control over government contracting and oversight.
YOU NEED A NEW BOOGIE MAN, and overt pressure for the next president to have to keep the fight up, so the war profit trough stays full, and you can escape culpability, and play a lot more golf.
So Bhutto is eliminated You can chestpound that chaos is afoot and demand more budgets, and keep your puppet in charge( who has no desires for democracy, whatsoever) and your Carlyle Group stock triples.
Can we please stop saying George is stupid now? , can we? Please?
He wants us to think its stupidity Because you cant be prosecuted for that
People think the only government is the executive branch, the CIA has been working these type operations AS THEIR MANDATE, and unlike the oval office those faces dont rotate.
(Unless you need a guy who is so ill qualified to run the CIA, he says so publicly, TO DESTROY SOME EVIDENCE so your whole plot doesnt go down the drain)
We were safer when there was a firewall between the president and the CIA. George learned early on right and wrong dont matter, Authority and resources do PERIOD that's why hes all about money and all about DECIDING. and when your dad has been POTUS and CIA director, you have to learn some tricks.
:teacher: Millionaires are lucky, Billionaires have a plan.
Follow the money... and really question the mere existence of an enemy
*who supposedly hates us for not good reason *doesnt have a country *doesnt have an army *may not even have a leader, other than the patsy whose LONGTIME family friends and business partners *In a country so remote to most of us, we wont notice if/when the war is over so we just keep paying the bill, no questions asked
This feels a lot like we are getting worked over with a good cop/ bad cop shakedown racket. NOSTRADAMUS >> MABUS = OSAMA + BUSH ??
They are winners everytime out, too many times for the Republicans to be INEPT.
Take it straight from the horses mouth.
"Sometimes MONEY trumps PEACE" George Bush
Posts: 2 | Location: Arcata,CA | Registered: 12 January 2007
Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.