The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  World Affairs & Iraq    Brother cautious over Guantanamo news

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Administrator
Picture of Sue N
Posted
quote:
Libyan-born British resident Omar Deghayes, 38, is among four British residents set to be released from US custody at Guantanamo Bay.


Link


Sue N.
 
Posts: 4624 | Location: UK | Registered: 16 November 2004Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
Yessss, that's the shit!

British, no less. International law? Due process? Allied forces? Who cares, right?
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
Picture of meljomur
Posted Hide Post
Sue,

I am curious, what do most Brits think of America and our government? I know when I lived there (2 1/2 years ago), people just seemed confused, but not necessarily hostile toward Americans, but IMO it seems to have gotten worse since that time.

I wonder how many more people have been held without cause.

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

LAND OF THE FREE, HOME OF THE BRAVE!


"Yeehaw" is not a foreign policy!
 
Posts: 875 | Location: The Emerald City | Registered: 02 January 2007Report This Post
Administrator
Picture of Sue N
Posted Hide Post
Meljomur, to be honest, I don't talk to all that many people, or read many newspapers, or watch much TV, so I don't feel I have a finger on the pulse of Britain. Sorry.


Sue N.
 
Posts: 4624 | Location: UK | Registered: 16 November 2004Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
Checked your link, Sue, and checked for an update. Seems that Omar Deghayes is now out on bail. Hope you don't let the Spanish have him after this.

This leaves Omar Khadr, who has been in there since he was 15 - and Harper figures the American justice is good enough for him:

quote:
Harper gets heat from U.K. on Khadr

British legal experts take government to task for violating international laws protecting children


The heads of the five legal organizations sent a letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper saying he must take "urgent action" in securing Khadr's release and criticizing Canada for violating international laws that protect juveniles.

"The lengthy detention, and putting on trial for war crimes, of someone who appears to be a `child soldier' is contrary to the special protection to which Khadr is entitled," the letter stated. "We regret to see Canada appearing to be complicit in such breaches of fundamental international standards of conduct in relation to children."

Khadr was 15 when he was captured in Afghanistan on July 27, 2002, following a firefight with U.S. forces. The Pentagon has charged him with murder in violation of the laws of war for allegedly throwing a grenade that fatally wounded army Delta Force Sgt. Christopher Speer. He also faces charges of attempted murder, conspiracy, providing material support for terrorism and spying. He is expected to go to trial sometime next year.

Now 21, Toronto-born Khadr remains the only Western detainee at the U.S. naval facility in Cuba and one of the first who would be tried before modern-day war tribunals. British detainees were repatriated due to their government's efforts by 2005. Intense lobbying by Prime Minister Gordon Brown's government has also secured the release of British residents, three of whom returned home Wednesday after almost six years in custody.

"We do not believe that Canada, a Commonwealth partner, should remain silent while the U.S. subjects its citizen to such a process. Every other ally of the United States, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Australia, has acted to protect their citizens detained at Guantanamo Bay," stated the letter to Harper.

(cont)

http://www.thestar.com/article/287678
 
Posts: 771 | Location: Winnipeg | Registered: 06 September 2001Report This Post
Administrator
Picture of Sue N
Posted Hide Post
quote:
There's no basis on which, according to what I understand, that we would have any basis detaining him or trying him here


weasel

Does that mean he is not accused of war crimes or international terrorism?

No civilized person would support Guantanamo, IMO, denying people to their right to a free trial. And I don't call Bush's brand of military tribunals a fair trial.


Sue N.
 
Posts: 4624 | Location: UK | Registered: 16 November 2004Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  World Affairs & Iraq    Brother cautious over Guantanamo news

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.