The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  World Affairs & Iraq    Partitioning India over lunch

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Administrator
Picture of Sue N
Posted
quote:
Memoirs of a British civil servant never published until now show how much the partition of India was decided by just two men


Link.


Sue N.
 
Posts: 4624 | Location: UK | Registered: 16 November 2004Report This Post
Picture of Gnarlodious
Posted Hide Post
Yeah too bad about Kashmir, eh? You would think the British could have set up a government where Hindus and Moslems could share a nation.

Of course, the Moslem propensity for demographic war would have spelled eventual disaster for the Hindus. So despite what the BBC says, it's probably just as well the Moslems got their own territory. The lesser of two evils, as it were.


-- The only time we see the middle of the road is as we run from side to side. R.O.Clark
 
Posts: 3959 | Location: Santa Fe | Registered: 11 June 2003Report This Post
Administrator
Picture of Sue N
Posted Hide Post
There has to be a better way.


Sue N.
 
Posts: 4624 | Location: UK | Registered: 16 November 2004Report This Post
Picture of Gnarlodious
Posted Hide Post
I don't understand what you mean by "There has to be a better way". Humans are competitive and selfish. We have been struggling against ourselves for as long as we have been a species.

The real cause of your dissatisfaction is that you apply English empire-building expectations to third world people. It should be adequate to let them be what they are, but more "civilized people have been messing around with backward nations for so long we assume it is our right to do so. Of course, they have our resources, so they are just a troublesome obstacle to exploitation of those resources. Unless they are willing to work, in which case we can make them into our willing slaves with a promise of consumer products.


-- The only time we see the middle of the road is as we run from side to side. R.O.Clark
 
Posts: 3959 | Location: Santa Fe | Registered: 11 June 2003Report This Post
Administrator
Picture of Sue N
Posted Hide Post
I meant, a better way than the British Empire.


Sue N.
 
Posts: 4624 | Location: UK | Registered: 16 November 2004Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Radio Program  Hop To Forums  World Affairs & Iraq    Partitioning India over lunch

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.