Yeah too bad about Kashmir, eh? You would think the British could have set up a government where Hindus and Moslems could share a nation.
Of course, the Moslem propensity for demographic war would have spelled eventual disaster for the Hindus. So despite what the BBC says, it's probably just as well the Moslems got their own territory. The lesser of two evils, as it were.
-- The only time we see the middle of the road is as we run from side to side. R.O.Clark
Posts: 3959 | Location: Santa Fe | Registered: 11 June 2003
I don't understand what you mean by "There has to be a better way". Humans are competitive and selfish. We have been struggling against ourselves for as long as we have been a species.
The real cause of your dissatisfaction is that you apply English empire-building expectations to third world people. It should be adequate to let them be what they are, but more "civilized people have been messing around with backward nations for so long we assume it is our right to do so. Of course, they have our resources, so they are just a troublesome obstacle to exploitation of those resources. Unless they are willing to work, in which case we can make them into our willing slaves with a promise of consumer products.
-- The only time we see the middle of the road is as we run from side to side. R.O.Clark
Posts: 3959 | Location: Santa Fe | Registered: 11 June 2003
Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.