The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Books on eco/politics  Hop To Forums  "We The People" & "What Would Jefferson Do?"    Separation of God & State?
Page 1 ... 12 13 14 15

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GG:
polycarp
quote:
if you dislike teen sex, take it up with God and neurobiologists.

Teen sex is causing cancer. But then, why should that bother you?
quote:
Feed the hungry, tend the sick, clothe the naked, shelter the homeless, provide drink to the thirsty, visit the imprisoned (including those tortured without trial). Simple.
You forgot to mention the "unborn". Are their lives a threat to you? Do they not have a right to live?


Show me the scripture quote, and I'll post it. Sure the unborn have a right to live. And you can't legislate making it illegal to have an abortion in the privacy of one's home own. No way to enforce that, is there?

We can, however, legislate that everyone receives necessary maternity care so the child is more likely to be born alive and healthy enough to remain alive.

Now, if you aren't willing to pool your resources so that 1/3 of the nation isn't ill fed, ill-housed, and ill-clothed, (to paraphrase Roosevelt), then tear the book of Matthew out of your bible. No problem. Then you can continue to support spending the majority of our tax money on building things to blow people up rather than on saving peoples lives and having lives of dignity as becomes any human being.

If you want a society that has huge and growing wealth disparities, then save your money. It ALWAYS leads fo a financial collapse that is sometimes accompanied by violent revolution. I'd prefer to avoid that sort of thing.

I'd suggest you read a bit of economiocs, sociology and past histories of the collapse of great civilizations in addition to your right-wing hogwash. Re-read the Book of Matthew while you're at it.

Then tell the Dems and Republicans to both jump off a cliff. Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum both support the same basic policies with very little difference between them. Their constituency is the "Corporate State". Give up the illusion that the majority of the people in this country are relevant to either of them.

Retired Monk
"Ideology is a disease"
 
Posts: 3412 | Location: denver co | Registered: 17 April 2007Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Loki:
quote:
Teen sex is causing cancer. But then, why should that bother you?
Proof please. And by 'proof' is meant, in this context, hard scientific data.

Hard science showing that sex before the age of 18 causes cancer, but after 18 suddenly turns to 'safe'.

The empirical evidence is easily accessible and multiple sexual partners is never safe at any age. In fact one British Medical research has proven that only one sexual encounter with someone "shedding" can be just as dangerous as multiple partners.

Think about this - having sex with someone is having sex with every one they have had sex with. If a person has had sex with 12 different people they have had sex with 4095 people. That is a shocking reality.


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
Since the Pledge of Allegiance and The Lord's Prayer are not allowed in most public schools anymore - Because the word 'God' is mentioned... A kid in Arizona wrote the attached school prayer:

Now I sit me down in school,
Where praying is against the rule.
For this great nation under God,
Finds mention of Him very odd.

If Scripture now the class recites,
It violates the Bill of Rights.
And anytime my head I bow,
Becomes a Federal matter now.

Our hair can be purple, orange or green,
That's no offense; it's a freedom scene.
The law is specific, the law is precise,
Prayers spoken aloud are a serious vice.

For praying in a public hall,
Might offend someone with no faith at all.
In silence alone we must meditate,
God's name is prohibited by the state.

We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks,
And pierce our noses, tongues and cheeks.
They've outlawed guns, but FIRST the Bible.
To quote the Good Book makes me liable.

We can elect a pregnant Senior Queen,
And the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King.
It's 'inappropriate' to teach right from wrong,
We're taught that such 'judgments' do not belong.

We can get our condoms and birth controls,
Study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles.
But the Ten Commandments are not allowed,
No word of God must reach this crowd.

It's scary here I must confess,
When chaos reigns the school's a mess.
So, Lord, this silent plea I make,
Should I be shot; My soul please take! Amen


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GG:
quote:
Originally posted by Loki:
quote:
Teen sex is causing cancer. But then, why should that bother you?
Proof please. And by 'proof' is meant, in this context, hard scientific data.

Hard science showing that sex before the age of 18 causes cancer, but after 18 suddenly turns to 'safe'.

The empirical evidence is easily accessible and multiple sexual partners is never safe at any age. In fact one British Medical research has proven that only one sexual encounter with someone "shedding" can be just as dangerous as multiple partners.

Think about this - having sex with someone is having sex with every one they have had sex with. If a person has had sex with 12 different people they have had sex with 4095 people. That is a shocking reality.


I asked for proof, you didn't provide it (incidentally, 12 times 12 does NOT equal 4095).

Typical ultra-right wing propaganda tactic: pose something as fact, and when asked to back up. lie about it, and change subject.

GG, I asked you the following question:

quote:
Proof please. And by 'proof' is meant, in this context, hard scientific data.

Hard science showing that sex before the age of 18 causes cancer, but after 18 suddenly turns to 'safe'.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post

By Benjamin F. Morris—1864

"I was debating an ACLU attorney at Christmas on an NPR station. I pulled out a Xerox copy of The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States and said to her: "Until you answer this book, the ACLU can't make a case against America's Christian founding." She was shocked when she saw it. She asked where I had gotten it. The only thing that gave her relief was the fact that the book was not in print. But now it is.

"Be afraid ACLU. Be very afraid. Morris packs The Christian Life and Character with page after page of original source material making the case that America was founded as a Christian nation. The evidence is unanswerable and irrefutable. This 1000-page book will astound you and send enemies of Christianity into shock. Keep in mind that it was published in 1864 and has been out of print for more than a century. It has been newly typeset using a very readable font and added subheads. A new Foreword written by my long-time friend Dr. Archie Jones describes the background of the book and provides a brief biography of the author."—Gary DeMar


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
typical GG. when asked a question, dodges the subject at hand (because she knows she will lose), and brings up a totally new topic.

ahhh, i see shes bringing up her annual war on xmas rhetoric again. time to go out in the back and chop me down a nice evolution tree. im gonna have it decorated with conflicting bible quotes. the holidays are festive times.


------------------------------------------
debating conservatives is easy. so easy, even a caveman can do it!

"if this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck lot easier, just so long as im the dictator" -GWB Dec 18,2002

 
Posts: 1614 | Location: ft myers florida area | Registered: 23 September 2006Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
look at what the catholic church is publishing now....

sad when we need to use comic books to warn youngsters about the dangers of sexual predator priests.

comic books warn children


------------------------------------------
debating conservatives is easy. so easy, even a caveman can do it!

"if this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck lot easier, just so long as im the dictator" -GWB Dec 18,2002

 
Posts: 1614 | Location: ft myers florida area | Registered: 23 September 2006Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
loki
quote:
I asked for proof, you didn't provide it (incidentally, 12 times 12 does NOT equal 4095).



http://www.dhss.mo.gov/BlackAIDS/SexExposureChart.html
If each of your partners has had only the same number of partners as you had at the same time you had sex...

[IMG]
http://www.dhss.mo.gov/BlackAIDS/SexExpoChart.gif[/IMG]
"When you have sex with someone, you are having sex with everyone they have had sex with for the last 10 years, and everyone they and their partners have had sex with for the last 10 years."


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
Loki,

www.megmeekermd.com/blog/starting-statistics/

This year alone, 2 to 4 million of those infected with STDs will be teenagers
Every day, 8,000 teens will become infected with a new STD
1 out of every 4 sexually active teens is living with an STD at this moment

Teenagers today are five times more likely to have herpes than they were in the 1970s
50% of all high school students have had sex by the time they graduate and between 12-20% have had 4 or more sexual partners
In a national survey, 1 in 5 teens reported that oral sex is safe sex
If a girl starts having sex before the age of 16, there’s a 58% chance that she’ll have more than five partners
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) is 5 times more common than all viral STDs combined and there are at least 30 strains of sexually transmitted HPV
Studies show that 46% of teenage girls contract HPV at their first sexual intercourse
HPV is directly linked to 99.7% of all cervical cancers
61% of young people between 13 and 19 infected with HIV are women
1 in five Americans over the age of 11 has genital herpes
62-91% of people with herpes — including teenagers — don’t realize they have it
15-20% of all boys will be infected with the herpes virus by the time they reach 18
85% of all people who test positive for herpes can shed the virus despite having no signs of clinical infection
4 out of 5 teenagers in a survey of 66 didn’t know that most people who get an STD never develop symptoms

In a recent report sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, they concluded that male latex condoms could reduce the transmission of HIV/AIDS but that there is not enough evidence to determine that they are effective in reducing the risk of most other sexually transmitted diseases

In a study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association, it was concluded that using condoms didn’t help men reduce their risk of getting Herpes at all
40% of the 3 million affected with Chlamydia each year are teenagers
If left untreated, Chlamydia will cause Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in 20 to 40% of cases
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) is the leading cause of hospitalization for females between the ages of 15 and 55
Teenagers make up 10% of the population but acquire 25% of all STDs
Nationwide, gonorrhea rates are highest among girls between the ages of 15-19
The cells covering a teenage girl’s cervix are physiologically different from the cells lining a 25 or 30-year-old woman’s cervix, and therefore are far more susceptible to STDs

These are 2002 or 2004 stats. Dr. Meeker has updated this information. Needless to say they are still rising. Some say it is not just an epidemic but pandemic.
________________________________________


www.bcpinstitute.org/steroid_brochure.htm


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
fisherman,

upset


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
GG,

You claimed this:
quote:
Teen sex is causing cancer.


I asked for proof. You came up with some highly debatable figures on STD's.

Newsflash: Cancer is not an STD.

Care to try again? You have two options, only two: admit that your initial claim was nonsense, of back it up with hard science.

Good luck.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
Loki
quote:
Cancer is not an STD.

STDs can lead to cancer - penile, anal, HPV, cervical, liver, neck, uterian, head and more. See 'Contraception' topic.


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
I know, I read your post.

However, all you have shown by this is that bad protection may eventually lead to cancer. Not directly, but indirectly.

However, your statement was that "Teen sex is causing cancer.". So what you will have to do now is unequivocally proof the direct connection between teen sex, not unprotected sex, but teen sex, and cancer.

Care to try again? (Third attempt.) You have two options, only two: admit that your initial claim was nonsense, of back it up with hard science.

Good luck.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
I understand your resistance because for ONE thing, the media fails to report what they know to be true for many reasons. Keep this fact in mind: a sexualized society is an easy take-over controlled society.

Every third girl has the human papilloma virus (HPV). HPV causes 99.7% of cervical cancer cases that kills over 5000 women each year. One out of ten has chlamydia. Even if we pulled out the healthy kids, the stadium would remain nearly full.

Consider these statistics:

* Almost half of all students in grades nine through twelve have had sex.

* Half of all girls are likely to be infected with an STD during their first sexual experience.

* Nearly one in four sexually active teens have an STD.

* Teens will contract nearly one in four of the 15 million new cases of STDs this year.

* Teens make up 10% of the population, but they contract up to 25% of all STDs.

* Herpes (specifically herpes simplex type 2 or "genital herpes") has skyrocketed 500% among white teenagers in the last 20 years.

* One in five children above age twelve tests positive for herpes type 2.

* One in ten teenage girls has Chlamydia; half of all new Chlamydia cases each year are diagnosed in girls 15 to 19 years old.


It gets worse. The Journal of the American Medical Association reported in a February 2002 editorial that the number of people with asymptomatic STDs (diseases with no outward symptoms like lesions or warts) probably exceeds those whose diseases are diagnosed. This means that the epidemic may be twice as large as we think.

The STD epidemic is a catastrophe. Millions of teens have been hurt. Millions more are threatened. Diseases are tearing into the bodies of our children in ways that will cause irreparable harm or possibly death.

The crisis exists because society has jettisoned the moral standards that direct sexual behavior. The shift began with the "sexual revolution" in the Sixties when the effects of unbridled promiscuity were largely unknown. (Only two known STDs existed thirty years ago, and both were treatable with penicillin.) As society adopted the values of the Sixties, the moral culture changed. Promiscuity ruled the day, and STDs spread like wildfire.

Big media is a big culprit because it targets teens with the message that sex has no risks. They have sexualized almost every corner of the youth culture. They relentlessly sell promiscuity, but make no mention of the harm that the promiscuity causes. They care for your child's wallet, but not for his welfare. Greed drives their moral recklessness.

There are things that parents can do. Several years ago the Search Institute, a Minneapolis-based think tank that studies the moral lives of children, isolated three factors in the lives of teens who successfully navigated the minefield of teen culture. The teens who developed sound morality and avoided non-marital sex and other enticements of the teen culture had three things working for them: 1) a relationship with a stable adult (parents); 2) friends who shared the same moral values; and 3) a religious grounding. Parents must cultivate this kind of environment.

Be alert to misrepresentations of the risks associated with sexual activity such as the "safe sex" campaign. Safe sex is a myth. Condoms can reduce the incidence of fluid borne STDs, but have no affect on diseases spread by skin-to-skin contact such as herpes. Even the reduction of fluid borne diseases is much less than most people think. Gonorrhea for example, is spread 50% of the time even when a condom is correctly used. Birth control pills can prevent pregnancy, but they are powerless against every kind of STD.

Note too that most organizations that promote safe sex are those that market promiscuity or profit from its consequences. Moral responsibility is not part the MTV, Abercrombie and Fitch, Cosmo Girl or Planned Parenthood corporate culture, for example. Safe sex campaigns give an appearance of moral respectability, but they avoid real moral accountability.

Meeker writes that her two-decade practice with teens has taught her that most teens have a deep-seated desire to protect their virginity. Religious clergy who work with teens report the same thing, and it is the reason many teens experience deep anguish after their first sexual encounter. They sense that something important has been lost. This desire for sexual purity needs to be cultivated and affirmed.


Teens are desperate for moral guidance. Those who know right from wrong must provide the moral clarity that our teens both crave and need.

http://www.crossroadsinitiative.com/library_article/77/...illing_our_Kids.html

Our youth have been sold a bill of goods regarding sexuality, and they are paying the penalty, big time. How shamefaced we all should be. How does one apologize to a teen who has contracted an STD and will be sick for the rest of their life, might not be able to marry and be a parent, - - will be contagious, therefore ostracized. Also, who's going to pay for the medical costs?


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
The Risks

Teen sexual activity carries with it numerous risks. You've probably heard of sexually transmitted diseases – but do you realize just how dangerous and common some STDs can be? This year alone, 3.8 million STDs will be contracted by teens in America. This is 10,000 teens per day (or one teen every 8 seconds)! Most people who acquire an STD in the United States are under the age of 25.

In addition, about 2,500 teen girls become pregnant each day in America. Beyond the physical aspects of teen sexual activity, there are many emotional effects of sexual activity outside of a committed, loving marriage. A recent study shows a link between sexual activity and depression in teens. As many teens have learned, there is no condom to protect the heart.


from www.projectreality.org


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
GG,

So far you are arguing for better protection for our children, and unless you are trying to say that NOT having sex at all is the best protection, which it isn’t because if it were, all our children would be safe, which, if we are to believe you, which I don’t, they are not, your argument is FOR better sex education.

If you DON’T mean to argue this, which is what I assume, given your right wing extremist streak, you have no choice but to actually argue your initial assertion, which was:
quote:
Teen sex is causing cancer.

So, once more:

Care to try again? You have two options, only two: admit that your initial claim was nonsense, or back it up with hard science.

Good luck.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
Loki,

quote:
Teen sex is causing cancer.

So, once more:

Care to try again? You have two options, only two: admit that your initial claim was nonsense, or back it up with hard science.

Good luck.
I've given you some very credible evidences. You have not made any attempt to prove that STDs do not put youth at high risk of cancer.

quote:
So far you are arguing for better protection for our children, and unless you are trying to say that NOT having sex at all is the best protection,
Teaching and exposing youth to sexaul activities is totally for controlling, demoralizing, and derailing their future. It is hazadous to their health. Sex IS NOT FOR YOUTH. The porn industry and planned baron hood industry make alot of money sexualizing youth. They know no boundaries and are increasingly aggressive.

The only safe sex is one life long partner in marriage.
quote:
your argument is FOR better sex education.

My argument is to teach youth that "no" to sex outside of marriage protects the essence of their personhood, protects their dignity, their right to life, and to develop virtuous character and their incredible potential. Uncontrolled passions harms youth's development.
quote:
extremist streak
My "streak" is to protect and speak against the exploitation of youth. What's yours?


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
GG
Posted Hide Post
quote:


* * * * * * * *
Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
 
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
GG,

You have provided me with a shower of onbliquely related quotations and links, but NONE of those directly connect teen sex to cancer, as you did in your initial assertion.

So, once more:

Care to try again? You have two options, only two: admit that your initial claim was nonsense, or back it up with hard science.

Good luck.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
GG,

So far, no science.

Care to try again? You have two options, only two: admit that your initial claim was nonsense, or back it up with hard science.

[edit: this post is in response to a comment by GG, that he now deleted; I will report this as an unfair discussion method]
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
GG, I see you cut out your post, probably because you don't want to look silly. Very mature indeed.

Now, please return to your line of 'reasoning', and argue the direct and scientifically proven link between teen sex and cancer.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
A recent study shows a link between sexual activity and depression in teens. As many teens have learned, there is no condom to protect the heart.


GG, i disproved that study in an earlier post. i proved that there was no connection between sex and depression, as the amount of depression seperating sexual and non sexual teens were minimal.


loki, ive been down this road with GG before. you cant reason or debate someone who lives in an alternate reality. even her own children have issues with her because of this (as her admittance in a post long ago). people like her (GG is a she, not a he) are "cancers" to society.

along my short time here, i have heard it all from this fundamentalist:
*birth control pills are causing fish to mutate
*condoms cause cancer
*there is a war on christman
*is ok to kill brown people because their religion teaches hate and death
*christianity, despite being the center of crusades, inquistions, and systematic extermination of other groups, is a peaceful religion.
*sex causes depression
*birth control pills cause cancer
*the catholic church, despite signing a treaty with the nazis in 1933, were saviors to the jewish people during ww2.

there are many more, too many to list. but i disproved her every time and her only responce was to change the topic.

looking back at the list, it also appears that GG thinks almost everything causes cancer.

i wonder if christianity, or religion in general, is a cancerigen?


------------------------------------------
debating conservatives is easy. so easy, even a caveman can do it!

"if this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck lot easier, just so long as im the dictator" -GWB Dec 18,2002

 
Posts: 1614 | Location: ft myers florida area | Registered: 23 September 2006Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
loki, ive been down this road with GG before. you cant reason or debate someone who lives in an alternate reality.
Oh yes, I know. You can't debate the clinically insane. But it's kinda fun watching him spin everything to his advantage, without being troubled by that pesky little thing we like to call 'logic'. Big Grin

quote:
I wonder if christianity, or religion in general, is a cancerigen?
Oh, it is: Jesus died of cancer, didn't you get the memo?
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
(GG is a she, not a he)
Ah, tx.
 
Posts: 247 | Location: Limbo | Registered: 17 November 2007Report This Post