The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General  Hop To Forums  Open Space / Lounge / Feedback    Proposed method to vote in the U.S.
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Posted
My idea for elections:
1) Voters fill in a Scantron (or other brand) ballot (like used at colleges for tests). This is PAPER ballot is used for the official count.

2) To satisfy Anmerica's love affair with technology, the voter takes his/her ballot to a Scantron reader, inserts it, and it gets counted to the joy of TV watchers all over the country.

3) The voter then takes the paper ballot and puts it in the cardboard ballot box.

4) Vote counters can be taken from a local pool of public employees, preferable not management level. They may be volunteers or not, but they are to be drawn at random for the job. Of course, representatives of each party in an election must be present during the count.

This is the official count. If there is any discrepancy (% to be determined) between this count and the machine count, then the paper ballots must be recounted.

This is so simple, and foolproof, it will work. Machine breakdowns will not affect the vote count, only the TV projects. Machines will still have to be made available for people with disabilities who are not able to mark a Scantron ballot.

And, it will not be that expensive because counters are already being paid by the taxpayers, and with the redundancy to the count, recounts will be less frequent. And best, I can't see how the vote can be hacked.
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Lakeside CA | Registered: 20 November 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
See my previous post in the AM-620 KPOJ forum listing an almost identical method. It doesn't make the hand count mandatory but allows for it.

Z.


Say what you mean and mean what you say.

Double talk is only good for political wonks and Lawyers.
 
Posts: 232 | Location: Portland, Or | Registered: 19 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General  Hop To Forums  Open Space / Lounge / Feedback    Proposed method to vote in the U.S.

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.