The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General  Hop To Forums  Open Space / Lounge / Feedback    My Signature
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Posted
I'm tired of my signature. I have been for a while, but it's the gift that keeps on giving. I've had people look up Alexander Tytler on snopes and and attack him and I've had others just bristle at the thought that the government shouldn't be able to buy them things. All in all, I believe what it says and enjoy the fact that others who don't see the world as I do, don't enjoy the sentiment.

Yesterday I heard this quote by George Washington which also expresses a sentiment I find accurate. I'm thinking about changing the signature.


quote:
Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.
George Washington


My question is, which quote do liberals find most annoying?


A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
 
Posts: 8264 | Location: Fl | Registered: 05 July 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Gnarlodious
Posted Hide Post
If the purpose is to irritate liberals, I might suggest this one:

There's no way to rule innocent men The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible to live without breaking laws -- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged


-- The only time we see the middle of the road is as we run from side to side. R.O.Clark
 
Posts: 3959 | Location: Santa Fe | Registered: 11 June 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
No, I think liberals would like that one. Hate crimes come to mind, as does the Cheney witch hunt. I like the Washington one better.


A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
 
Posts: 8264 | Location: Fl | Registered: 05 July 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Or maybe:

"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand. "

Milton Friedman


"Support mental health, or I'll kill you".
 
Posts: 825 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 27 January 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Well, Don, I personally don't see either as annoying. But I don't know what "liberals" think.

First time I read your Alexander Tytler quote I got to the proposition "exist as a permanent form of government" and I wondered what a permanent form of government was supposed to mean, who would want such and thing and what kind of mind set would come up with such a proposition, and that proposition sort of fell apart into a bunch of abstract nothingness for me, and so there wasn't much more to it.

George Washington and those folks were trying to figure out what they mean when they used those terms like "government" then, and I'm still trying to figure it out myself. At least he saw it as something bordering on dynamic, which makes more sense to me, because I tend to see what we might try to think of as government more as the ongoing waves of a lot of processes in peaks and valleys, that come together to attempt to accomplish something, maybe actively solve ongoing problems, hopefully learn in the process to be better prepared for new ones.

The illusion these efforts we make to articulate what we mean by government comes out in attempts to personify it in ways that make the abstract culmination of the legal structures seem like something out of a Greek myth, but then they were pretty much all the beneficiaries of a classical education, and so Washington DC looks like it does.
 
Posts: 3997 | Location: Road Prison 36 | Registered: 05 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of meljomur
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sawdust:
I'm tired of my signature. I have been for a while, but it's the gift that keeps on giving. I've had people look up Alexander Tytler on snopes and and attack him and I've had others just bristle at the thought that the government shouldn't be able to buy them things. All in all, I believe what it says and enjoy the fact that others who don't see the world as I do, don't enjoy the sentiment.

Yesterday I heard this quote by George Washington which also expresses a sentiment I find accurate. I'm thinking about changing the signature.


quote:
Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master.
Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. George Washington


My question is, which quote do liberals find most annoying?


No but I bet another George might take offense to the last part...


"Yeehaw" is not a foreign policy!
 
Posts: 875 | Location: The Emerald City | Registered: 02 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Loganthor
Posted Hide Post
I might have a couple to choose from:

quote:
"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but
an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions." - James Madison, 1792


quote:
"No legislative act … contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid." - Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 78


quote:
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." - James Madison criticizing an attempt to grant public monies for charitable means, 1794


quote:
"I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the General Government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit." - President Grover Cleveland, 1887


There is more Here


**** Disclaimer: The information in this weblog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my owner. It is solely my own personal opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.***

"I stand or fall on my own words."
 
Posts: 7253 | Location: PORTLAND | Registered: 07 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of meljomur
Posted Hide Post
These are great Log, I might use one of these.


"Yeehaw" is not a foreign policy!
 
Posts: 875 | Location: The Emerald City | Registered: 02 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Gnarlodious
Posted Hide Post
I notice that all those views were espoused before the Great Depression.


-- The only time we see the middle of the road is as we run from side to side. R.O.Clark
 
Posts: 3959 | Location: Santa Fe | Registered: 11 June 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Loganthor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
These are great Log, I might use one of these.

Now your just screwing with me.


**** Disclaimer: The information in this weblog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my owner. It is solely my own personal opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.***

"I stand or fall on my own words."
 
Posts: 7253 | Location: PORTLAND | Registered: 07 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Sawdust, how about a picture to go along with your new signature. I always had fun with the "No Che". But being part radicalized, I liked the anti-revolutionary spirit.
 
Posts: 7939 | Location: Santa Barbara | Registered: 19 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
My son's sig is a photo of a snail melting from being sprinkled with salt. Under the photo it says: "I can sell salt to a snail."

And if you knew my son you'd probably agree with him. Big Grin I think he's a natural born lawyer/politician type.

Anyway... ...that's my tangent for the day.


Because people with no hopes are easy to control ~ The Neverending Story
 
Posts: 5455 | Location: East Bay | Registered: 25 July 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Brian wins. So many people think that the term "general welfare" means everything, it's important to understand that the phrase wasn't intended to be a catch all for the next great brain fart.


A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
 
Posts: 8264 | Location: Fl | Registered: 05 July 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of --Kate
Posted Hide Post
Sawdust,

You could try this:

"I'm rich, and you're not."


---------------------------------------------------------------
"if you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got."
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Posts: 6804 | Location: usa | Registered: 09 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by --Kate:
Sawdust,

You could try this:

"I'm rich, and you're not."


No need waste words on rationales, huh Kate... Wink
 
Posts: 3997 | Location: Road Prison 36 | Registered: 05 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of meljomur
Posted Hide Post
Oh boy Saw, I am really mad now!!!!


"Yeehaw" is not a foreign policy!
 
Posts: 875 | Location: The Emerald City | Registered: 02 January 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by --Kate:
Sawdust,

You could try this:

"I'm rich, and you're not."
 
Posts: 7939 | Location: Santa Barbara | Registered: 19 July 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ronald Rutherford:
quote:
Originally posted by --Kate:
Sawdust,

You could try this:

"I'm rich, and you're not."


Is this the board's self-appointed thought police striking again, keeping those board thoughts monitored and within bounds on a serious topic like this one? Or an attempt to show appreciation for someone's humor?


If only someone would explain these things...
 
Posts: 3997 | Location: Road Prison 36 | Registered: 05 February 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of --Kate
Posted Hide Post
Well, you never know, what evil good lurks in the hearts of men's souls.


---------------------------------------------------------------
"if you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got."
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
Posts: 6804 | Location: usa | Registered: 09 February 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
How's this one Kate, "if you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got."


A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
 
Posts: 8264 | Location: Fl | Registered: 05 July 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Loganthor
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Brian wins




I would like to start my thanking all the people who this moment possible.

Mom / Dad you guys were always there for me. Thanks goodness you guys we in the grips of a global ice age that inspired my birth 9 mouth later

Thom… You’re the man. Not even Lars has his own discussion board.

I promise not to let this award go to my head… Honestly it just would not fit.


**** Disclaimer: The information in this weblog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my owner. It is solely my own personal opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.***

"I stand or fall on my own words."
 
Posts: 7253 | Location: PORTLAND | Registered: 07 November 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General  Hop To Forums  Open Space / Lounge / Feedback    My Signature

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.