that patronizes, appeases and works in conjunction with older men
Who use young girls for sex; - the older the man the younger the girl
The organization
that violates the law and does not report the statutory rape crimes..
that allows the victimized girl to continue being used and abused by covered over crimes of predatory men,
The organization
described as a “carefully-manicured public persona”, as a "reproductive health" organization that provides sex education, family planning and services to prevent sexually-transmitted diseases…
that makes money off the sufferings of young girls’ pregnancies, removing the baby in her womb and then send her packing to continue to be a sex slave for the predatory man.,
The organization
that pulls in $810 million dollars a year $8.34 BILLION since 1987 $254 MILLION of hard earned tax payers money yearly!
The organization
that is the statutory rape positive wing of feminism..
embraces privacy so sweeping that it includes men who have, under law, raped their young sexual partners…
that encourages sexual exploitation of innocent young girls...
NAIL THEM! Make them pay for their crimes.
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
It sounds like you are describing the Catholic Church. Or, perhaps, this is your own childhood? Maybe you are talking about your dad? You really should stop that bleeding from your palms. "Bad daughter, bad, evil daughter. Stop thinking those crazy thoughts!" "Hail Mary Mother of God..."
Do you hear that voice? That's god. What was that? Should I whip myself as punishment for those evil thoughts?"
To you of all people, AJ, I addressed a brief rendition of my life. God help me for doing it because you use it against me. It was a very weak moment for me and you will see that I live to regret it, won't you? I was reacting to something in these discussions, striving to reach out to _______and discover________ what cannot be explained with the limitations of this medium.
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
t sounds like you are describing the Catholic Church.
The organization I'm speaking about is a perverse organization protecting child rapists.
Imagine (if you can!!) an organization devoted to the interests of women finds itself not protecting their sisters at all.
Loopy free sex advocates teach teens how to put on a condom and it is adult men who more often exploit teen girls and not their male peers. It is estimated that at least 60% of the teen births, the father is an adult!
THE ORGANIZATION rakes in whooping amounts of money at the expense of teens. It represents the wing of the feminista brigade (men are not exempt) who are 'sex positive', but better known as "statutory rape positive".
The organization wants the money and will not abide by law to report these predatory men, declaring it is a privacy matter. Privacy is the COVER UP for profits.
It is a sad fact that men who impregnate 12 and 13 year olds are not being reported and the money making machine is cooperating and protecting these men. And young girls cry.
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
It was one of the worst cases of child abuse Warren County Prosecutor Rachel Hutzel has ever seen - and she has seen a few.
"I thought I would get held in contempt of court because I argued it so vigorously in court," she said, still outraged by the case eight months later. "The father was basically treating his daughter like she was his wife."
John Blanks Jr. of Mason was sentenced to five years - one year in prison for every year he molested his daughter, beginning when she was 13. "She had to get up out of his bed in the morning and go to school, if you can imagine what that was like," Hutzel said. ADVERTISEMENT
In May 2006, the girl told a Mason High School official what was going on. "She finally decided she wasn't going to take it anymore and she didn't want her sibling to become a victim," Hutzel said.
Now the girl says in a lawsuit filed Wednesday that the abuse could have been stopped earlier. In November 2004, when she was 16, the girl was forced by her father to have an abortion. She reported the abuse at the Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Cincinnati, her lawyer says.
"She tried to put an end to this abuse," said Brian Hurley, "by informing a Planned Parenthood employee that she has been forced to have sex and to do things she did not want to do. Tragically for her, Planned Parenthood's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy was in full force."
State law requires teachers, clinic workers and others to report suspected abuse to police. But Planned Parenthood "completely ignored her cry for help," Hurley said, and his client was "raped on many occasions over the next one and one-half years."
Becki Brenner, president of Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio, said: "I won't speak on individual patients, but I am very eager to see the facts of this case come out for public review. I can't tell you the facts because of the legal issues, but I think people may be surprised."
She also said, "We do not have a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy."
Hurley also represents "Jane Roe," a victim of sexual abuse by her soccer coach at age 14. She was taken by the abuser to Planned Parenthood in the fall of 2004 for an abortion. Although she used a junior-high school I.D. and the coach, 21, paid with a credit card and driver's license, Planned Parenthood failed to report the abuse.
Planned Parenthood officials said they were misled and did not know the man who gave permission and paid for the abortion was the abuser.
That case is still in court. An appeals court hearing is expected Tuesday on Judge Patrick Dinkelacker's order for Planned Parenthood to turn over records of underage abortions to Hurley. As in similar cases in Indiana and Kansas, Planned Parenthood has invoked patient privacy. Even if names and addresses are deleted, Planned Parenthood attorney Daniel Buckley argued there are "profound and significant privacy issues."
But based on records obtained so far, Hurley said, "My guess is that this is just the tip of the iceberg, and that is why Planned Parenthood will do anything to prevent us from seeing its records."
In the Roe case, a Planned Parenthood "Documentation Form for Suspected Sexual or Child Abuse Report" says:
"Patient reports pregnancy is a result of sexual assault by a stranger."
"After consultation with (Planned Parenthood) attorney, report of a crime to the police was not made; due to physician-patient privilege, we are prohibited from reporting as no severe bodily injury was reported."
Hurley said prosecutors in four local counties know of no such exception to reporting requirements. Hutzel agreed. If evidence of severe injury were required, "there would be no reports in the vast majority of situations," Hurley said.
Hutzel said she is "keeping the door open" for possible criminal prosecution depending on what is revealed in the civil case.
"By failing to report it and giving her an abortion and birth-control pills, they sent her home with him and he abused her for another year and a half," she said. "That had to have been one of the darkest days of her life. She has just had an abortion, now she has to get back in the car and go home with him."
Hurley also found a note in Planned Parenthood files about sexual abuse that mentions "don't ask, don't tell."
Pro-life people are continually frustrated over the protections and kid-glove treatment given to the abortion industry. We routinely see politicians, law enforcement officials, medical boards and others in official capacities blatantly ignoring the abortion industry's flaunting of state laws and regulations.
Sometimes, these people go beyond simply looking the other way and openly run interference for the abortion mafia. In effect, they become a member of the abortion mafia. A textbook example of this has been seen recently in Kansas regarding notorious late-term baby killer George Tiller. ..
In a nutshell, it is undeniable that corrupt public officials, Sedgewick County District Attorney Nola Foulston, State Attorney General Paul Morrison, and State Judge Paul W. Clark are shielding Tiller from criminal prosecution.
The evidence against Tiller is overwhelming, but with the support of a filthy alliance between Foulston and Clark, the first week he was in office Morrison dropped 30 criminal charges against Tiller that had been filed by outgoing Attorney General Phill Kline. Public records show that Morrison received over $250,000 in contributions from Tiller during his recent election campaign but, to no one's surprise, the leftstream media is not making a big deal out of it. I guess that those of us in the great unwashed masses are supposed to believe that this is just a coincidence.
All across America this sort of thing is repeated on an almost daily basis. The fact is, the abortion industry routinely skates for doing things that would put anyone else in prison. The question is: why? How do they get away with it?
During our years of undercover work in the abortion industry, we have gained some insight into the way our enemies think and operate. One observation we’ve made is that they figured out a long time ago that no one – be they an abortion industry employee or customer – wants to be identified with abortion.
In short, the abortion industry knows that the filthy nature of their business can be used as a weapon to protect themselves. Moreover, it fits perfectly within their nature to do just that.
At Life Dynamics, we see this played out in our litigation support program. We have worked with many clients over the years who have been severely injured during abortions or raped by the abortionist but would not bring lawsuits because they don’t want it to be publicly revealed that they had an abortion. Once, we even had the parents of a girl who was killed during an abortion refuse to sue for that very reason.
Of course, the abortion industry knows this and anytime an abortion-injured woman asks the court to allow her to sue anonymously, their attorney will viciously fight it because they know if the court rules against her she may drop the suit.
Now apply this scorched earth philosophy to the following scenarios:
• an abortion clinic customer tells the clinic counselor that the baby’s father is a prominent public figure or a potential “rising star” in the future, or
• the customer herself is a known public figure or someone the clinic thinks may be a “rising star” in the future, or
• the customer, or the father of the baby, is a member of a prominent political family; law enforcement agency, medical licensing board, etc.
The number of possible scenarios is unlimited but the point is that, given the nature of the abortion industry, it is not farfetched that copies of these medical records would end up at the National Abortion Federation or in the internal files of Planned Parenthood's political operatives.
Think about this. Even his most ardent supporters admit that, during his eight years as president, Bill Clinton betrayed every constituency group that put him in office. The lone exception was the abortion industry. He literally gave them everything they wanted. He even allowed the Department of Justice to be turned into their private police force.
With Clinton's history, is there any doubt that during his rise to the top a few pregnancies occurred? Put another way, is it unlikely that more than a few babies had to die in order to salvage his political career? And if you are an abortion clinic worker with a client who says that the father of her baby is the up and coming governor of Arkansas, is it beyond the realm of possibility that her chart ends up in a political file somewhere?
If that is so, and you would have to be hopelessly naive not to think it is, the fact that Clinton demonstrated only one area of loyalty is suddenly not so difficult to understand. He was simply smart enough to know better than to betray the people who helped him bury his skeletons.
The point is, if you need the kind of information that could be used to control the police, politicians or state regulators, where is it more likely to be found than at the friendly neighborhood abortion clinic? And you can bet the family farm that if they have it, their buddies in the political arena also have it.
If nothing else, they at least know where to dig.
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
Aborted fetuses are being dissected alive, harvested and sold in pieces to fuel a vast research enterprise
The doctor walked into the lab and set a steel pan on the table. "Got you some good specimens," he said. "Twins." The technician looked down at a pair of perfectly formed 24-week-old fetuses moving and gasping for air. Except for a few nicks from the surgical tongs that had pulled them out, they seemed uninjured. "There's something wrong here," the technician stammered. "They are moving. I don't do this. That's not in my contract." She watched the doctor take a bottle of sterile water and fill the pan until the water ran up over the babies' mouths and noses. Then she left the room. "I would not watch those fetuses moving," she recalls. "That's when I decided it was wrong."
The technician uses the pseudonym "Kelly." She has her back to the camera, she wears a wig. and her voice is electronically modified because she says she fears for her life. Until a few months ago Kelly worked for a Maryland company called the Anatomic Gift Foundation. Her job was to procure fetal tissue for research. She worked at a Planned Parenthood clinic that was also a member of the National Abortion Federation. Her interview appears on the May issue of "Life Talk" video magazine—the first of a monthly series of videos released by Life Dynamics Inc., a renegade pro-life group based in Denton. Texas, that admits to having spies work in abortion clinics to uncover their most closely guarded secrets.
This week the group is releasing the documentary evidence it has gathered since Kelly approached them nearly two years ago. Life Dynamics has dozens of order forms from researchers requesting fetal parts, price lists for fetal organs and tissue, and donation consent forms for women undergoing abortion. It offers a gruesome glimpse at a vast trade in human tissue from babies that are aborted, and sometimes vivisected, to satiate the exploding multibillion-dollar biotechnology industry.
The traffic in tissue flows worldwide into respected tax-funded laboratories, including Canadian ones. The research itself is usually for laudable goals, from helping prenatal infants survive to curing Parkinson's disease. But the trade, worth billions. raises myriad ethical questions: Are some humans being killed to benefit others? Are women being exploited to support tissue collection? Who is profiting from the trade? And what are the social implications of its existence?
Once the stuff of cheap science-fiction, human clones, artificial wombs and human-animal cross-species are all now serious possibilities. Sexless procreation is already a reality with in vitro fertilization. Selective breeding of human beings is commonplace thanks to embryo screening and "genetic terminations." And human- human brain cell "These researchers don't want to see the whole baby. That would freak them out. They think they're about higher medicine that is serving a cause — not about dead babies."
transplants are government-funded. All of these endeavours rely on aborted fetuses.
Scientists have used fetal tissue in research since at least the 1950s, says Pittsburgh researcher Suzanne Rini, author of the 1995 book Beyond Abortion: A Chronicle of Fetal Experimentation. Thirty years ago, as abortion laws were relaxing and some second- and third-trimester abortions were performed by hysterotomy (essentially a Caesarean section), experiments on live fetuses were cutting-edge technology. Geoffrey Chamberlain received a professional award for research (outlined in the March 1968 issue of The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology) in which he took live aborted fetuses, attached them to an artificial placenta, perfused them to see if he could make them live, and then pulled the plug on them. No one objected.
It was shortly after that article, Mrs. Rini notes, that the Cambridge Evening Post featured a story on Lawrence Lawn, a physician who did manage to provoke controversy when it was learned that he was procuring live fetuses from a private abortion clinic. "We are simply allowing something which is destined for the incinerator to benefit mankind," he said, obliging a photographer with a picture of himself standing next to a dying fetus suspended in a perfusion tank. Yet even Dr. Lawn believed there were limits. "Of course we would not dream of experimenting with a viable child. We would not consider that to be right."
With the decriminalization of abortion in the 1970s, fetal research became, in the words one ethicist, a "golden opportunity for researchers. The public almost never heard about fetal experimentation. But by the 1980s, some of the most macabre research was being publicly funded. Mrs. Rini catalogues experiments ranging from the perfusion of impaled beating fetal hearts with adrenaline and caffeine to eye-tissue transplants and skin grafting. Dr. Bernard Gondos of the University of Connecticut at Farmington, whose research on fetal gonads described most of his specimens as "previable dead," lamented having to import fetuses from outside the United States. Dr. Karen Holbrook of the University of Washington received a $259,740 grant in 1984-85 for her work on "Fetal Skin Biology" using first-, second- and third trimester human fetuses. She told Mrs. Rini: "Hopefully they are not born alive. It's better to avoid that. The skin is taken after fetal demise." Asked if the skin diseases she was trying to diagnose prenatally were fatal, Dr. Holbrook replied, "No, but they ruin your life."
By the 1980s transplants had become entrenched, and fetal tissue, which grows quickly and is less likely to trigger an immune reaction in a host, became even more coveted. Fetal tissue transplants became part of efforts to treat diabetes, Huntington's disease, blindness, spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, leukemia and more. In 1988, U.S. president George Bush banned federal funding of fetal human-to-human transplants. This move was widely mistaken for a ban on all fetal tissue research; in fact, most such research carried on unimpeded.
In any case, Bill Clinton's first official act as president in 1993 was to strike down the ban. People were demanding to be "treated" with fetuses. California lawyer Joan Samuelson had founded the Parkinson Action Network (PAN) in 1990 to lobby for an end to the moratorium. "Will lifting the ban save us in time?" she asked when it was abolished, and she began lobbying for an accelerated grant review process for fetal-tissue transplant research.
Transplants of brain tissue from young fetuses (usually aborted at less than 10 weeks) into Parkinson's sufferers have attracted the most public attention to fetal tissue research... link
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
With the decriminalization of abortion in the 1970s, fetal research became, in the words one ethicist, a "golden opportunity for researchers. The public almost never heard about fetal experimentation. But by the 1980s, some of the most macabre research was being publicly funded. Mrs. Rini catalogues experiments ranging from the perfusion of impaled beating fetal hearts with adrenaline and caffeine to eye-tissue transplants and skin grafting. Dr. Bernard Gondos of the University of Connecticut at Farmington, whose research on fetal gonads described most of his specimens as "previable dead," lamented having to import fetuses from outside the United States. Dr. Karen Holbrook of the University of Washington received a $259,740 grant in 1984-85 for her work on "Fetal Skin Biology" using first-, second- and third trimester human fetuses. She told Mrs. Rini: "Hopefully they are not born alive. It's better to avoid that. The skin is taken after fetal demise." Asked if the skin diseases she was trying to diagnose prenatally were fatal, Dr. Holbrook replied, "No, but they ruin your life." link
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
Nobody, favors the ultimate destruction of women. If you read this unfortunate mini-blog--I urge you to speak out against women with a destructive agenda, against women in the United States! Act now! Save us all!!
Posts: 582 | Location: New York City | Registered: 13 February 2007
Originally posted by GoodBusiness: Nobody, favors the ultimate destruction of women. If you read this unfortunate mini-blog--I urge you to speak out against women with a destructive agenda, against women in the United States! Act now! Save us all!!
Why aren't you doing it also?
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
In April of 1997, Life Dynamics began an undercover investigation into the marketing of body parts harvested from babies killed by elective abortions. This investigation lasted approximately 31 months. Most of the information in this report was provided by employees who worked at Comprehensive Health for Women (Comp Health) - a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic located in Overland Park, Kansas.
The System
Federal laws, and many state laws, make it illegal to buy or sell human bodies or body parts. However, they can be legally donated for medical research and certain other legitimate purposes. In such cases, the supplier is allowed to recover from the recipient any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that were necessary to fill the recipient's order.
Some abortion industry insiders, wanting to financially profit on the growing market for fetal tissue and body parts, have devised a scheme to circumvent these restrictions. This is how the system works:
1) A baby parts "wholesaler" enters into a financial agreement with an abortion clinic in which the wholesaler pays a monthly "site fee" to the clinic. For this payment, the wholesaler is allowed to place a retrieval agent inside the clinic where he or she is given access to the corpses of children killed there and a workspace to harvest their parts. In most cases, this retrieval agent is an employee of the wholesaler. In other instances, the retrieval agent is a clinic employee who was trained by the wholesaler.
2) The buyer - usually a researcher working for a medical school, pharmaceutical company, bio-tech company or government agency - supplies the wholesaler with a list of the baby parts wanted.
3) When such orders are received by the wholesaler, they are faxed to the retrieval agent at the clinic who harvests the requested parts and ships them to the buyer via FedEx, Airborne or a similar common carrier.
4) These parts are "donated" by the clinic to the wholesaler who turns around and "donates" them to the buyer. The buyer then "reimburses" the wholesaler for the cost of retrieving the parts.
On the surface, this system does not appear to violate the legal prohibitions against trafficking in human body parts since, technically speaking, no one is buying or selling anything. The loophole is that site fees and retrieval reimbursement amounts are unregulated. The law requires that such payments be reasonable and reflect the actual cost of securing the parts, but there are no state or federal laws which establish guidelines or sets limits regarding these payments. Additionally, no governmental or law enforcement agency is charged with overseeing the system.
This means that the wholesaler is free to set site fees and retrieval fees at any amount. Despite the fact that the baby parts business is teeming with profound moral implications, and despite the fact it has enormous potential for financial abuse, it is allowed to operate on the honor system.
It is certainly no secret that this sort of self-policing never works in environments where large amounts of money are involved. In this case, the result is that the corpses of children killed by elective abortion are now marketed like old car parts salvaged from the local junkyard. Rhetoric like "site fees," "donations," and "retrieval reimbursement costs" are simply code words designed to conceal that fact. link
* * * * * * * * Without traditional regular moral principles that may be consulted confidently, justice cannot long endure anywhere.
Posts: 6275 | Location: Maine | Registered: 31 December 2005
Street talk, here in NYC, is that used amputation legs and arms, are being utilized by the Al Quida terrorists, to construct bombs to blow up anti-abortion clinics!!! WATCH OUT!!!
Posts: 582 | Location: New York City | Registered: 13 February 2007
AJ quote: t sounds like you are describing the Catholic Church.
The organization I'm speaking about is a perverse organization protecting child rapists.
yup, you ARE describing the catholic church GG.
quote:
The organization wants the money and will not abide by law to report these predatory men, declaring it is a privacy matter. Privacy is the COVER UP for profits.
yup, we also all know the catholic church covered up the sexual assaults by clergy. hmmm, perhaps it was so the collection baskets dont start becoming empty. they surely arent making profits now that tey have had to settle with the poor abused and molested people.
quote:
quote: Originally posted by GoodBusiness: Nobody, favors the ultimate destruction of women. If you read this unfortunate mini-blog--I urge you to speak out against women with a destructive agenda, against women in the United States! Act now! Save us all!!
Why aren't you doing it also?
i believe goodbuisness was refering to you GG. you certainly are destructive and a woman. so you fit the criteria.
------------------------------------------ debating conservatives is easy. so easy, even a caveman can do it!
"if this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck lot easier, just so long as im the dictator" -GWB Dec 18,2002
Posts: 1614 | Location: ft myers florida area | Registered: 23 September 2006
why so surprised? you justify our nation killing innocent civilians overseas. i see that as a destructive action. justifing or approving wrongful death is just as bad as committing the genocide yourself GG.
you justify bush destroying our constitutional rights in the name of homeland security. since you accept and approve of it, and his destructive actions, you are also at fault, and hence, destructive.
you approve of the pope saying that all other churches are fakes, incomplete, or broken. by shutting out all other christians not of your denomination, you preach the opposite of unity and welcoming. and this is called destruction or dividedness.
so, yes, you are destructive. dont sound so surprised.
------------------------------------------ debating conservatives is easy. so easy, even a caveman can do it!
"if this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck lot easier, just so long as im the dictator" -GWB Dec 18,2002
Posts: 1614 | Location: ft myers florida area | Registered: 23 September 2006
GG, would you please write back what would get you thrown off this site? I'm thinking. How about rude behavior? I hope you are barred from this web-blog. I don't have the courage to make Custer's Last Stand Here, mainly please just know how I was taught to treat bullies! I will be watching. Not, but going now. I'll confront you again if you misquote me. Please DO NOT QUOTE ME HERE. DO NOT ADDRESS ME DIRECTLY HERE. Please, DO NOT DISGUST ME HERE.
Posts: 582 | Location: New York City | Registered: 13 February 2007
Here is demonstrated the Horrible Consequences of swallowing wholesale an ideaology-others on this blog-add have noted the dangers. An ideaologue sacrifices his/her capacity for 'independent thinking'. The notion that the mind is actively engaged in a process of maturing, throughout life is absent. I suppose, then, nobody asks THEM, "What's new?"
Posts: 582 | Location: New York City | Registered: 13 February 2007
AJ, "its perfectly normal" is pornographic to the core. A sane person would not want this book in the hands of youth expecting any good results. It totally demoralizes the human body, leaves nothing to the imagination and fills in with explanations and not limited to how to go and use your body for sexual gratifications without the natural consequences of sex outside of the covenant of marriage. It's pornographic intent is to get youth sexualized, robs them of their youth and takes their minds off goals for their future.
There is NO dignity towards the body or personhood in this book. It violates both boys and girls and more so young girls. The author (I think a female) knows no shame, has lost her ability to blush, is not ashamed of what she has done to write and produce sexual material in such sub-standard method for unsuspecting youth and too often parents are unaware of pornography taught in the class rooms and available in LIEbraries.
I don't understand professionals allowing the following - - -
The sistine chapel is pornographic to the core. A sane person would not want this painting visible to the eyes of youth...
quote:
It totally demoralizes the human body, leaves nothing to the imagination
You have an imagination? Beside, what difference does it make? There are plenty of people of your generation that had sex BECAUSE they left too much to their imagination. And don't give us that crap that people didn't have sex out of wedlock when you were in your twenties. I don't buy it. It's a myth. People have sex and I would prefer that people knew what it was all about rather than having this infantile dysfunction because they got some weird tall tale from a young friend when they were little.
Kids want to know what they are going through. They need to know. They need guidance. They want our help working it all out but because people like you are so flipped out about your own sexuality, you just pass it on to your young.
As adults, we forget too quickly what our own lives were like. If we spent any time looking back, we'd see fairly active young people with very misinformed ideas.
And here you are flipping out about a book that has drawings of naked people. It describes sex in as being something normal and that bothers you? Did it ever occur to you that the problem with our sexual attitudes here in the United States are cause by an unrealistic and unnatural view of what sex is because it's kept hidden?
quote:
...sex outside of the covenant of marriage.
What covenant? You mean that covenant that, when I got married, your church wouldn't let me belong to? That covenant? Your covenant? Besides, what is marriage? What is religion?
Don't you know that religion is a human constructs designed to rule over a often uncontrollable population of people?
So, tell us how you remained a virgin until you got married? What husband are you on now? Why didn't you obey your father? What were you doing when you hit that moose?
quote:
It's pornographic intent is to get youth sexualized, robs them of their youth and takes their minds off goals for their future.
You mean goals of dying for a lie in a war for a president who was just trying to cover up the fact that he didn't protect us on 911? That goal? Wow do you have to stretch things to make them work, don't you?
quote:
There is NO dignity towards the body or personhood in this book.
Yes there is because it treats the human as a logical natural person rather than some fantasy that never actually existed
quote:
It violates both boys and girls and more so young girls.
No, it violates your absurd, disjointed and fanatical ideas about sex. It's YOUR problem, now ours.
quote:
The author (I think a female) knows no shame,
You mean the kind of shame that God demanded when he ordered girls to be stoned to death in front of their father's house?
quote:
has lost her ability to blush,
Victorian sensibilities...if you really want to go back to those times then surely, you better not show your ankles or wear a swimsuit or vote or own property...no, no, no, those things are just for men. We can go back further too.
quote:
is not ashamed of what she has done to write and produce sexual material in such sub-standard method for unsuspecting youth and too often parents are unaware of pornography taught in the class rooms and available in LIEbraries.
Yet you are fine with porn in your church. Oh, yes, and if it's killing brown Muslim people, you're all for that too.
Read-Only Topic
