The Thom Hartmann Radio Program
Live Chat Room -- Topic-by-topic audio archives -- Audio Archives -- Web Pages -- Articles on Democracy
New Since your Last Visit
 
We The People
Activism Alerts
Articles by Thom
Audio Archives
Bibliography
Biography
Book Reviews
Books by Thom
Bumper Music
Candidates
Chat Emoticons
Chat Room - main
Clips
Cracking the Code
Events
Frames
Interviews
Law
Movies
National show
News
Newsletters
NLP classes
Photos
Stack
Tag, you're it!
Thom's .com site
Transcripts
White Rose
More!
  Links
  Mercury Retrograde

Subscribe to
Thom Hartmann's Free Newsletter on Politics & the Environment
(we respect your privacy and do not sell or share our list)
Email 
First 
Name 
My email program supports HTML 
    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Books on eco/politics  Hop To Forums  Unequal Protection    Question regarding Remedies proposed in this book

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Posted
Considering the book was published a few years ago, is it wise, now, to try to push the issue before the current Supreme Court with its latest corporate friendly appointments? Seems a good way to get the headnotes error actually written into the fourteenth amendment for real.
 
Posts: 15 | Location: Chicago, IL | Registered: 30 March 2006Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
I have two questions regarding this book: First, why was this problem not addressed during FDR's presidency, when it would seem the public attention was at its peak (this was also about the time when the "Republican Conspiracy" about the drafting of the 14th Amendment was floated about, according to the book.) Second, how did Teddy Roosevelt get the Tillman Act passed when by that time it appeared that the full spectrum of corporate rights were in full effect, i.e. it would seem the Tillman Act would have failed any court challenge.
 
Posts: 12 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: 08 July 2007Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AmyCarter:
I have two questions regarding this book: First, why was this problem not addressed during FDR's presidency, when it would seem the public attention was at its peak (this was also about the time when the "Republican Conspiracy" about the drafting of the 14th Amendment was floated about, according to the book.) Second, how did Teddy Roosevelt get the Tillman Act passed when by that time it appeared that the full spectrum of corporate rights were in full effect, i.e. it would seem the Tillman Act would have failed any court challenge.


The public kind of demanded corporations be removed from politics. They'd had enough and weren't complacent sheep regarding this. They hadn't been brainwashed that "what's good for corporations is good for the U.S.A".

Personhood for corporations really made the Tillman Act irrelevant and undid every state law related to it once it was challenged. The political rights of corporations weren't challenged until after FDR.

Corporations do need "partial personhood" in order for them to be challenged in the courts for wrong-doing. Personhood broadened to extend them civil rights that include the right of free speech in the political process is an abomination and has led right back to the corruption the Tillman Act attempted to address.

Retired Monk
"Ideology is a disease"
 
Posts: 3412 | Location: denver co | Registered: 17 April 2007Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Discussion Community    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Thom's Books on eco/politics  Hop To Forums  Unequal Protection    Question regarding Remedies proposed in this book

Individuals are legally responsible for their views. Messages or parts of messages may be quoted or read on the radio, or reprinted in Thom's books and other materials.